<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kansas City Paranormal Studies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kcparanormal.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kcparanormal.net</link>
	<description>is there an &#039;out there&#039;, out there?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:30:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New show: DARK MATTERS by Ghost Bait</title>
		<link>http://kcparanormal.net/2010/02/new-show-dark-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost Bait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcparanormal.net/?p=720#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Man the first show was killer. At least I think it was killer. Therefore it was killer, right!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man the first show was killer. At least I think it was killer. Therefore it was killer, right!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 23: EM, Part 1 by Cap'n Casper</title>
		<link>http://kcparanormal.net/2009/11/23empart1/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Casper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcparanormal.net/?p=597#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Ahhh... good questions, grasshopper. I will be talking about this during next week&#039;s show, but I&#039;ll go ahead and give you the short answer for now.

Milligauss is a measure of magnetic field strength. It was adopted as an alternative to the Tesla scale, due to the finer resolution of magnitude. So, what your meter is measuring are CHANGES in the strength of a magnetic field. 

The meter uses a small coil of wire (inductor) to measure a changing magnetic field, due to the induced voltage that appears on the coil when it is near a time-varying magnetic field. This also explains why it is not influenced by nearby radios, and the necessity of close proximity to a mains source. The magnetic field generated by radios is (by design) much less then the electric field generated, and hence propagated as EM waves, in order to transmit over greater distances while reducing power consumption. (there is a lot more to that, but I&#039;ll get into it next week) 

As far as RF is concerned, there is always a possibility that readings are being affected by some source of RF (or low freq EM). Any semiconductor (like transistors in your meter) can be affected by EM waves of different frequencies and alter genuine magnetic field results. Most inexpensive devices are not properly shielded and thus contribute to the problem. 

However, above all else, EM meter readings are not very useful without knowing the FREQUENCY of the fields being read. In order to do this, you need a meter with a spectrum analysis function. They are quite expensive, and I will give some suggestions regarding this issue next week. 

As far as EM meters responding during EVP sessions: evidence suggests that there is a link between EM (magnetic and electric fields) and the production of EVP. I&#039;ll talk about this, too... David is well versed in this as well. 

OK, so that&#039;s the short answer... I&#039;ll be getting pretty deep into the subject both on the podcast next week and in the new Equipment pages. (see EM, Part 1 and 2 .. when I get them done) It should only be a couple of more days. 

Hope this helps. Thanks for weighing in!!

All the best.

Cap&#039;n</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh&#8230; good questions, grasshopper. I will be talking about this during next week&#8217;s show, but I&#8217;ll go ahead and give you the short answer for now.</p>
<p>Milligauss is a measure of magnetic field strength. It was adopted as an alternative to the Tesla scale, due to the finer resolution of magnitude. So, what your meter is measuring are CHANGES in the strength of a magnetic field. </p>
<p>The meter uses a small coil of wire (inductor) to measure a changing magnetic field, due to the induced voltage that appears on the coil when it is near a time-varying magnetic field. This also explains why it is not influenced by nearby radios, and the necessity of close proximity to a mains source. The magnetic field generated by radios is (by design) much less then the electric field generated, and hence propagated as EM waves, in order to transmit over greater distances while reducing power consumption. (there is a lot more to that, but I&#8217;ll get into it next week) </p>
<p>As far as RF is concerned, there is always a possibility that readings are being affected by some source of RF (or low freq EM). Any semiconductor (like transistors in your meter) can be affected by EM waves of different frequencies and alter genuine magnetic field results. Most inexpensive devices are not properly shielded and thus contribute to the problem. </p>
<p>However, above all else, EM meter readings are not very useful without knowing the FREQUENCY of the fields being read. In order to do this, you need a meter with a spectrum analysis function. They are quite expensive, and I will give some suggestions regarding this issue next week. </p>
<p>As far as EM meters responding during EVP sessions: evidence suggests that there is a link between EM (magnetic and electric fields) and the production of EVP. I&#8217;ll talk about this, too&#8230; David is well versed in this as well. </p>
<p>OK, so that&#8217;s the short answer&#8230; I&#8217;ll be getting pretty deep into the subject both on the podcast next week and in the new Equipment pages. (see EM, Part 1 and 2 .. when I get them done) It should only be a couple of more days. </p>
<p>Hope this helps. Thanks for weighing in!!</p>
<p>All the best.</p>
<p>Cap&#8217;n</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 23: EM, Part 1 by scottyrock</title>
		<link>http://kcparanormal.net/2009/11/23empart1/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>scottyrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcparanormal.net/?p=597#comment-173</guid>
		<description>James,

    Like the new look of the site. As I always do, I found your discussion on electromagnetism very informative. Now I have a question.

    My EMF meter measures from 0 to 5 milligauss. I&#039;m sure its not the best meter out there, but here&#039;s the thing. If I am outside, &quot;and this has happened on more than one occasion.&quot; 
    If I am outside in a given area with zero EMFs say at nine/pm, then I return to the same area at 11/pm and my meter is going crazy for quite some time. What am I measuring?
    Keep in mind that the area I am refering to had no powerlines or other known source of emfs. You might say that it could be a radio transmission in the area and normally I would give this consideration. However, I have radios that I use on investigations and they have never influnced this meter unless within a couple of inches of it. 
    Even in a house, this meter dosn&#039;t seem to be effected unless you are directly on the source. Given that this meter only measures zero to five milligauss, I wouled think that it would be easly effected by the slightest EMF.
    Also during EVP sessions, this meter has been known to reflect EMFs during the session.
Again, what am I mesuring?

Don Wilson,Open Gate iprg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>    Like the new look of the site. As I always do, I found your discussion on electromagnetism very informative. Now I have a question.</p>
<p>    My EMF meter measures from 0 to 5 milligauss. I&#8217;m sure its not the best meter out there, but here&#8217;s the thing. If I am outside, &#8220;and this has happened on more than one occasion.&#8221;<br />
    If I am outside in a given area with zero EMFs say at nine/pm, then I return to the same area at 11/pm and my meter is going crazy for quite some time. What am I measuring?<br />
    Keep in mind that the area I am refering to had no powerlines or other known source of emfs. You might say that it could be a radio transmission in the area and normally I would give this consideration. However, I have radios that I use on investigations and they have never influnced this meter unless within a couple of inches of it.<br />
    Even in a house, this meter dosn&#8217;t seem to be effected unless you are directly on the source. Given that this meter only measures zero to five milligauss, I wouled think that it would be easly effected by the slightest EMF.<br />
    Also during EVP sessions, this meter has been known to reflect EMFs during the session.<br />
Again, what am I mesuring?</p>
<p>Don Wilson,Open Gate iprg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 22: Daemon inside . . . by What is meaningful evidence . . . and more.</title>
		<link>http://kcparanormal.net/2009/11/22daemoninside/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>What is meaningful evidence . . . and more.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcparanormal.net/?p=485#comment-171</guid>
		<description>[...] Next time: Daemon Inside . . . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next time: Daemon Inside . . . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Learning from the paranormal by Graceamazed</title>
		<link>http://kcparanormal.net/2009/07/learning-from-the-paranormal/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Graceamazed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcparanormal.net/?p=429#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Hey James -- Actually your science is right on track..We do have multiple realities. Given the limitations of our physical form we can&#039;t access them directly. -- Here are two interesting resources... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse ---
*&quot;The multiverse (or meta-universe (metaverse)) is the hypothetical set of multiple possible universes (including our universe) that together comprise all of reality. The different universes within the multiverse are sometimes called parallel universes. The structure of the multiverse, the nature of each universe within it and the relationship between the various constituent universes, depend on the specific multiverse hypothesis considered.&quot;

--- and there&#039;s more... :) Food for thought...

*The book - &quot;The Universe and Multiple Reality presents an understandable view of parallel universes and quantum physics––and explains what this means in our daily lives.

The Universe and Multiple Reality explains to the non-scientist reader in understandable, non-mathematical language the paradox of Schrödinger&#039;s Cat, the two-slit experiment, and recent developments in quantum physics and cosmology.

There are a great many other books on “parallel universes,” on quantum physics and multiple reality––but none that offers an understandable model of how minds interact with multiple realities at the quantum level to produce palpable physical effects including paranormal phenomena.

This book is a must for any intelligent person curious about the cosmic scheme of things and the place that their mind holds in it.&quot;

http://www.manyuniverses.com/indexH.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey James &#8212; Actually your science is right on track..We do have multiple realities. Given the limitations of our physical form we can&#8217;t access them directly. &#8212; Here are two interesting resources&#8230; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse</a> &#8212;<br />
*&#8221;The multiverse (or meta-universe (metaverse)) is the hypothetical set of multiple possible universes (including our universe) that together comprise all of reality. The different universes within the multiverse are sometimes called parallel universes. The structure of the multiverse, the nature of each universe within it and the relationship between the various constituent universes, depend on the specific multiverse hypothesis considered.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212; and there&#8217;s more&#8230; <img src='http://kcparanormal.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Food for thought&#8230;</p>
<p>*The book &#8211; &#8220;The Universe and Multiple Reality presents an understandable view of parallel universes and quantum physics––and explains what this means in our daily lives.</p>
<p>The Universe and Multiple Reality explains to the non-scientist reader in understandable, non-mathematical language the paradox of Schrödinger&#8217;s Cat, the two-slit experiment, and recent developments in quantum physics and cosmology.</p>
<p>There are a great many other books on “parallel universes,” on quantum physics and multiple reality––but none that offers an understandable model of how minds interact with multiple realities at the quantum level to produce palpable physical effects including paranormal phenomena.</p>
<p>This book is a must for any intelligent person curious about the cosmic scheme of things and the place that their mind holds in it.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.manyuniverses.com/indexH.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.manyuniverses.com/indexH.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 19: Back to Basics by Journeying into the world of Quantum Paranormal Research?</title>
		<link>http://kcparanormal.net/2009/07/19-back-to-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Journeying into the world of Quantum Paranormal Research?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcparanormal.net/?p=418#comment-166</guid>
		<description>[...] Next Time: Back to Basics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next Time: Back to Basics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 18: Taking a Quantum Leap by Redefining science and spirituality with wisdom from the greats in physics.</title>
		<link>http://kcparanormal.net/2009/04/18quantum-leap/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Redefining science and spirituality with wisdom from the greats in physics.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcparanormal.net/?p=406#comment-155</guid>
		<description>[...] Next Time: Taking the Quantum Leap [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next Time: Taking the Quantum Leap [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 17: Appropriate Science by How can we be scientific AND spiritual?</title>
		<link>http://kcparanormal.net/2009/04/17aptscience/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>How can we be scientific AND spiritual?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcparanormal.net/?p=393#comment-153</guid>
		<description>[...] Next time: Not shooting ourselves in the foot with science&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next time: Not shooting ourselves in the foot with science&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 13: EVP and Audio Part 2 by March 2009 Presentations and Interviews &#124; New Jersey Paranormal Resource Group</title>
		<link>http://kcparanormal.net/2009/03/13evppart2/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>March 2009 Presentations and Interviews &#124; New Jersey Paranormal Resource Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcparanormal.net/?p=357#comment-139</guid>
		<description>[...] with KC Paranormal Studies  March [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with KC Paranormal Studies  March [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 16: Science v. Religion&#8230; Round 1! by How can we effectively use Quantum physics to help us understand the paranormal?</title>
		<link>http://kcparanormal.net/2009/04/16-science-v-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>How can we effectively use Quantum physics to help us understand the paranormal?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kcparanormal.net/?p=386#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] Next time: Science v. Spirituality&#8230; what gives? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next time: Science v. Spirituality&#8230; what gives? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: kcparanormal.net @ 2010-09-08 06:44:23 -->